1. He attended a racist church for 20 years
2. He chose Joe Biden for his running mate
3. He claims to want to provide tax breaks for 95% of the american people, but only 60% of the american people pay federal taxes, do the math.
4. he proposes another 400 billion dollars in federal programs, we've got a deficit with a 3 trillion dollar budget, only a math-blind idiot should still support him past this point
5. congradulations, did anyone teach you simple math? moving on, Obama's community orginization ACORN blackmailed banks and fradulantly registered people to vote, and Obama ACTIVELY SOUGHT THEIR ENDORSEMENT.
6. Obama received hearty campaign donations from Fannie May and Freddie Mac, hmmmm the same people who screwed us over like Obama, see any problems with this?
7. Obama has recieved donations from Chinese interests, little problem with that, I think.
8. He has never apoligized for his vote against the Born Alive Protection act. now only people who can't add and subtract AND heartless, callous, sadistic, people support past this point
9. He has no executive experience, only legislative.
10. He's has the same economic policies as Jimmy Carter, and those policies nearly killed America.
One paragraph, all true, short sweet, and to the point. from the bottom of my rock-solid heart.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
From the bottom of your rock-solid heart? lol wow. No comment.
Firstly, Obama totally pwned the whole ACORN thing in the debate tonight. Sorry, but that point has no relevance.
He also explained his stance on the Born Alive Act. We've discussed this...
geez,
okay, Obama didn't really "pwn" the ACORN idea, i looked this all up, i think he lied through his teeth, just because the local democrats can be called admirable doesn't mean you president nominee isn't a dirty liar.
He lied through his teeth about the Born alive protection act as well, i don't care what euphemism he uses to justify his vote, if his stance on ifant protection is NO then he's a callous murder-sympathizer, i'm not playing into his political bullcrap. i'd love to see his hellbox, it's probably overflowing.
Against my better judgement I'll try to make a point here...
Actually, the selection of Joe Biden for VP is a very good selection, from a political point of view. He's been fairly close to the center, he's not scary to most Americans, and he's capable of speaking his mind, usually in a polite manner. The 'R' pick for VP was poor. She hasn't added much to the ticket that wasn't already there, except an easy target for liberals, SNL, and talk show hosts.
I'm not prepared to dispute your other points, however Jess is right on one thing. John Mccain, a man whom I've always liked and respected, was "pwned" in the last debate.
Not really sure whose fault that is. He just didn't look presidential. Such things probably shouldn't matter when we select the person who will control the most powerful military in the world, but strangely they do...
In order to win McCain needed to stop pandering to the right wing base and court the center weeks ago, if not months. For some reason he kept on shoring up his base rather than trying to convince independant thinkers to come to his side. It will prove to be a fatal mistake, especially since the rightest wing of the Republican party will never accept him no matter how hard he tries. He's proven himself too capable of indepenant thought over the years for their tastes.
Feel free to disagree with me. I'm as vulnerable to being mistaken as I am willing to listen to all sides of a discussion without putting up too many shields.
Monty
i'll leave a couple pointers
>Biden is no where close to the center, he used to be, he's disavowed all of his former centrist views to run with Obama, don't believe me? go watch the VP debate.
>It doesn't matter who the republicans choose, they will always be attacked by liberals, SNL, liberal talk shows are fringe productions that rarely get over 300,000 viewers/listeners at anyone time.
>who was "pWned" (just as a note, some people emphasize the W) depends entirely on your point of view, i don't watch debates on TV so i have no clue how McCain looked, but when it comes to content and ideas McCain blew Barack out of the water
>McCain is tied in polls with Obama, Republicans usually are (a poll taken before the 1984 election had Reagan behind 10 points, the election was a landslide in Reagans favor) just to cite an example.
>McCain really hasn't done much "pandering" at all, compare his record with Baracks, Obama pandered to the extreme left before the primaries, thyen disavowed most of those people during the general season.
-R/w/b
Post a Comment